National Police Service Responds To Claims Of Intimidation Against High Court Judge

The National Police Service (NPS) has issued a response to accusations from the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) regarding alleged intimidation and the withdrawal of security detail from High Court Judge Justice Lawrence Mugambi.

In a press release dated September 16, 2024, Acting Inspector General of Police Gilbert Masengeli refuted claims that the recent security reassignment was retaliatory in nature following his six-month prison sentence for contempt of court.

Routine Operational Decision

Masengeli clarified that the decision to reassign the security detail was a routine operational measure rather than an act of retaliation. He explained that the officers previously assigned to Justice Mugambi were recalled for mandatory training and assured that adequate arrangements have been made to ensure the judge’s safety.

“The IG has accorded the Judiciary, like other arms of government, the requisite protection without favour or discrimination,” the statement emphasized.

Masengeli further stated that the reassignment of security details falls under the independent command of the Inspector General as per Article 245 of the Constitution, asserting that such decisions are free from external interference. He highlighted that the IG’s responsibilities encompass the security of all Kenyans and that reassignments are based on operational needs and security assessments.

Legal Entitlements and Public Reaction

According to the statement, only President William Ruto, Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, and Retired President Uhuru Kenyatta are legally entitled to personal security details.

The explanation has sparked widespread outrage on social media, with many Kenyans—including legal experts, activists, and users—rejecting the statement. Critics argue that the explanation undermines judicial independence and raises concerns about potential intimidation.

Also read:Actor Dan Sonko Mourns The Loss Of Former Partner Winnie Bwire